I know what you've all been thinking: You've been thinking: What's a yule log?
I've been wondering the same thing myself. I have no idea. Why don't you check out Wikipedia. I bet they know. They know everything.
I'm not going to blog about yule logs today. No. I'm going to blog about something way more important. And that is this.
I've actually decided not to blog about anything. Goodbye
Tuesday, December 19, 2006
Friday, December 15, 2006
Admittedly, a lame post
I'll admit that I'm just updating so I can pretend I update this blog somewhat regularly. But I just started reading Special Topics in Calamity Physics in Labyrinth while I was waiting to see if I would win something in the raffle I'd entered (I did...) and it was so awesome, at least the first twenty pages were, that I had to buy it. I'm going to read it all weekend instead of studying for finals and writing papers. Sweet! So far, at least, she's like a Nabokov who's been injected with incredibly strong doses of pop-culture. Double Sweet!
Friday, December 08, 2006
You should read this
And by this, I mean the review I wrote, not the book I'm reviewing. Then again, go ahead and read the book. See if I care.
Monday, December 04, 2006
Also
I had a letter published in today's Columbia Spectator. It was bitter and funny, so I'm (naturally) not linking to it. But I'm sure you can find it if you really want.
Post about life
Hey All,
Isn't it amazing that I'm sitting here with a slice of pizza and blogging when I should be studying patents and copyright, in that order. What's amazing is that I'm at Cafe Nana and will soon post this into the blogosphere where my 3 readers will enjoy it.
I've decided to name my 3 readers:
1) Frank
2) Girlfriend
3) Bezalel
Thank you, Frank! You are the only person here who has no secret incentive to read this blog! I love you, Frank! (I love you too, Girlfriend) - I'm iffy about Bezalel.
You attentive reader will probably have also noticed that I posted pictures on my blog. These are from my trip to LA for Thanksgiving. I saw water. And sandpipers. Here is a picture of a sandpiper.
That Sandpiper was my friend. Then he flew away.
I also saw people.
Isn't it amazing that I'm sitting here with a slice of pizza and blogging when I should be studying patents and copyright, in that order. What's amazing is that I'm at Cafe Nana and will soon post this into the blogosphere where my 3 readers will enjoy it.
I've decided to name my 3 readers:
1) Frank
2) Girlfriend
3) Bezalel
Thank you, Frank! You are the only person here who has no secret incentive to read this blog! I love you, Frank! (I love you too, Girlfriend) - I'm iffy about Bezalel.
You attentive reader will probably have also noticed that I posted pictures on my blog. These are from my trip to LA for Thanksgiving. I saw water. And sandpipers. Here is a picture of a sandpiper.
That Sandpiper was my friend. Then he flew away.
I also saw people.
Tuesday, November 28, 2006
"New Post"
This post will be about the fact that this is a new post. I'm busy. With things. I'm excited for an article I'm writing for the magazine PresentTense, but I can't even think about that now, as I'm doing too much other shit. I will no longer use the word shit on this blog. I might be going to Barnes and Noble tonight, just so I can feel intellectual and smug. How stupid is that? Anyway, I'm really busy, and this blog has been getting too many hits. Stop coming here. I'm just a megalomaniac. There was a really good article I just read on Slate about how the internet is all about being a megalomaniac. I agree. But my site is different, because while whatisdavedoing.com is about a boring person, bibliophile is about me, and I lead an exciting life. And am too cheap and un-computer savvy to have my own real website.
Also, I wrote half instead of have today. I am a genius.
Also, I wrote half instead of have today. I am a genius.
Monday, November 20, 2006
Words of Wisdom from Regina Spektor
This is how it works
you take the things you like
and try to love the things you took
8 pm warsaw tomorrow - I'll be there
you take the things you like
and try to love the things you took
8 pm warsaw tomorrow - I'll be there
Friday, November 17, 2006
Dream Catcher
I've been going to sleep incredibly late lately,almost early, between four and five. In consequence, I'm guessing (because I can't figure out any other reason why) I've been having incredibly strange, vivid dreams.
Last night, I dreamed that I was in the San Francisco, California area for Pesach with my extended family. It was the first night of Pesach, although it was daytime, and we were all outside our hotel hanging out and getting ready for the seder, which would be in the next room. Suddenly, there was a huge explosive sound, and we saw a space-ship flying through the air, leaving a thick trail of black smoke. "Oh," my father said, "that's the new space-ship". So then I wasn't worried, because I knew it was planned, and was going into space. But then the space-ship skewed off course and the bottom part fell off, and into the hills above our view. The top of the space-ship made it into space though. Suddenly, there was a nother, huge explosive sound, and an entire house, or housing complex, flew into the air. This was a couple of hills away.
I decided that I wanted to see this, even though it was the night of Pesach, and we had just started the Seder. So I walked away, and followed these paths that went between and through streets and constantly kept going up the hill. After one big street, I came to a winding path and there was an old man on the path, coming down. There wasn't room for both of us, so I moved to the side as best I could, climbing on rocks to do so. The old man made a comment about how the cars ruined the city, and how it was so hard to get around anymore. "At least," I said, "they have these walkways. I think they're really great." "Yes," the old man said, "they are really great." And I couldn't tell whether he just wanted to agree with me or whether he really agreed with me.
I kept walking up the path, which had by the time I met the old man begun to zig zag. Suddenly, I was through some barrier and could see all the hills around me, but then, suddenly, I was also incredibly afraid of heights. For some reason, the path ahead seemed incredibly jagged, and I couldn't take a step forward. I just couldn't take a step forward. So I turned around and went back.
By the time I got back, the whole Magid part of the Seder was over, and the family had, in fact, moved rooms, or I had been confused about where they had been before and they were actually at an adjoining room. I went in, and everyone in my immediate family looked disappointed. They were all either eating the meal or were done. Then they were going visiting. There were two troops of visitors. The first, stopped not so far away at a very vertical street, almost at a 90 degree angle, and they took a van I think, one of my cousin's and I (I remember who, but in the interest of privacy am not saying) took a scotter - he was driving, and I was behind him, to his or her friend's hotel. I remember getting there, and we went inside the hotel, and it was a lot lower class than the hotel we were staying at. The hallways were thin and the lighting was dim. And there were a lot of people there. We went down a hallway and turned right, to the elevator bank, and then my cousin gave me a wink and gently tapped the elevator button so the light turned on. Then it turned out that next to the elevator bank there was a semi-large foyer or living area, where people were gathered, to read Megillat Esther, before it was read in the morning. I was thinking that there was something wrong about this and then I woke up.
Just one comment - although there are many I'd like to make. The winding paths, while reminding me, in my dream of San Francisco, reminds me now of Jerusalem, and walking to my cousin's house there through Rechavya.
Last night, I dreamed that I was in the San Francisco, California area for Pesach with my extended family. It was the first night of Pesach, although it was daytime, and we were all outside our hotel hanging out and getting ready for the seder, which would be in the next room. Suddenly, there was a huge explosive sound, and we saw a space-ship flying through the air, leaving a thick trail of black smoke. "Oh," my father said, "that's the new space-ship". So then I wasn't worried, because I knew it was planned, and was going into space. But then the space-ship skewed off course and the bottom part fell off, and into the hills above our view. The top of the space-ship made it into space though. Suddenly, there was a nother, huge explosive sound, and an entire house, or housing complex, flew into the air. This was a couple of hills away.
I decided that I wanted to see this, even though it was the night of Pesach, and we had just started the Seder. So I walked away, and followed these paths that went between and through streets and constantly kept going up the hill. After one big street, I came to a winding path and there was an old man on the path, coming down. There wasn't room for both of us, so I moved to the side as best I could, climbing on rocks to do so. The old man made a comment about how the cars ruined the city, and how it was so hard to get around anymore. "At least," I said, "they have these walkways. I think they're really great." "Yes," the old man said, "they are really great." And I couldn't tell whether he just wanted to agree with me or whether he really agreed with me.
I kept walking up the path, which had by the time I met the old man begun to zig zag. Suddenly, I was through some barrier and could see all the hills around me, but then, suddenly, I was also incredibly afraid of heights. For some reason, the path ahead seemed incredibly jagged, and I couldn't take a step forward. I just couldn't take a step forward. So I turned around and went back.
By the time I got back, the whole Magid part of the Seder was over, and the family had, in fact, moved rooms, or I had been confused about where they had been before and they were actually at an adjoining room. I went in, and everyone in my immediate family looked disappointed. They were all either eating the meal or were done. Then they were going visiting. There were two troops of visitors. The first, stopped not so far away at a very vertical street, almost at a 90 degree angle, and they took a van I think, one of my cousin's and I (I remember who, but in the interest of privacy am not saying) took a scotter - he was driving, and I was behind him, to his or her friend's hotel. I remember getting there, and we went inside the hotel, and it was a lot lower class than the hotel we were staying at. The hallways were thin and the lighting was dim. And there were a lot of people there. We went down a hallway and turned right, to the elevator bank, and then my cousin gave me a wink and gently tapped the elevator button so the light turned on. Then it turned out that next to the elevator bank there was a semi-large foyer or living area, where people were gathered, to read Megillat Esther, before it was read in the morning. I was thinking that there was something wrong about this and then I woke up.
Just one comment - although there are many I'd like to make. The winding paths, while reminding me, in my dream of San Francisco, reminds me now of Jerusalem, and walking to my cousin's house there through Rechavya.
Monday, November 13, 2006
Mr. Ripley as Idol and Target
I just finished The Boy Who Followed Ripley, the fourth book in the Ripley pantheon and the third that I've read. You probably know Ripley - the creation of Patricia Highsmith - from the 1999 movie with all those hot guys in it, you know. I think Matt Damon, Jude Law. Anywho, I read the first book two years ago, and here's a brief plot summary oh wait, spoiler alert - Ripley, a poor kid from the 'other side of the tracks' in Boston, goes to New York, hooks up with this rich guy who thinks he went to Princeton and is rich, and is sent to Europe to bring the guy's son home. Badda bing badda boom, Ripley kills the guy's son (whom he ambiguously had a thing for, but for Highsmith, ambiguity is never that ambiguous), impersonates him, kills another guy, and gets a bunch of money.
Ok spoilers over - for the first book, hahaha. Anyway, this book, TBWFR (for the boy who followed, you get it), takes place years later. Ripley is married (practically sexlessly, to a beautiful Frenchwoman with incredibly wealthy folks) and living south of Paris. Then basically, the opposite of what happened in the first book occurs. That is, Ripley gives himself a new job, to find a rich person's child and bring him back to America. Except this time, Ripley does all the right things, he brings the boy home, and then the boy kills himself. Ooops, I just ruined the book for you. Sorry. It's worth it, though, because now I get to make a point.
The point is this: Highsmith, in her typical subversively tricky way, is saying that there's no point to doing good, because, while Ripley, in book 1, follows his animal instincts to get what's best for him, and thereby ends up rich and happy, in book 4, Ripley tries to be good, does everything right, basically does pennance for his misdeeds of book 1 by totally reversing them, but in the end Ripley just feels sad and empty. He comes away with nothing but hurt. Good book.
Ok spoilers over - for the first book, hahaha. Anyway, this book, TBWFR (for the boy who followed, you get it), takes place years later. Ripley is married (practically sexlessly, to a beautiful Frenchwoman with incredibly wealthy folks) and living south of Paris. Then basically, the opposite of what happened in the first book occurs. That is, Ripley gives himself a new job, to find a rich person's child and bring him back to America. Except this time, Ripley does all the right things, he brings the boy home, and then the boy kills himself. Ooops, I just ruined the book for you. Sorry. It's worth it, though, because now I get to make a point.
The point is this: Highsmith, in her typical subversively tricky way, is saying that there's no point to doing good, because, while Ripley, in book 1, follows his animal instincts to get what's best for him, and thereby ends up rich and happy, in book 4, Ripley tries to be good, does everything right, basically does pennance for his misdeeds of book 1 by totally reversing them, but in the end Ripley just feels sad and empty. He comes away with nothing but hurt. Good book.
Friday, November 10, 2006
Pre Shabbos Jitters
I always never do anything on Fridays. Maybe this is why I love Fridays so much. I mean, today for example, I spent pretty much the whole day outside, and accomplished pretty much zero, but it's been the best day of the week, by far.
Wednesday, November 08, 2006
Rainy Days
I love rainy days. I have a great window and I can just stare out of it for hours, when it's raining. Looking at the drops on the glass, and how they attach themselves to the horizontal pole outside my window that I think is there to keep me from falling, and how they fall, and looking into Harlem and seeing the GW bridge all wet and foggy in the rain.
I also love still sitting here, in shorts and a t-shirt, when it's cold and wet outside and I'm warm and happy. Very very happy.
In other, not entirely unrelated news, I've been doing a bunch of writing lately.
I also love still sitting here, in shorts and a t-shirt, when it's cold and wet outside and I'm warm and happy. Very very happy.
In other, not entirely unrelated news, I've been doing a bunch of writing lately.
Tuesday, October 31, 2006
Good things....
Come in buckets. Never one at a time.
One of said things is this: I just received the proofs of my law review article. They look stellar.
One of said things is this: I just received the proofs of my law review article. They look stellar.
Monday, October 30, 2006
Beautiful Day
I've made it a rule (that I've pretty much followed, surprisingly) not to blog about things that I do in my professional or academic life. In other words, I only blog about my avocations. I think this is smart. First, it won't get me into trouble with the few people who read this blog (hopefully) assuming I have any professional relationship with those people. Second, eh I'm bored of listing reasons and I'll get to the point.
The point is, I'm going to talk about a book that's tenuously related to my academic life right now. Which is why - and for no other reason - I am not going to mention the book's name, or its author, or what it's about. Maybe what it's about will come up, but I'll try not to let it.
Anyway, I was rereading a book yesterday for a pseudo-academic pursuit. I had read this book the first time in high school, and hadn't picked it up in as many years. It turns out I had written notes in it, when I was in twelfth grade, I think. This was in the highlight of my loving literature phase. I discovered books - really, for the first time, even though I had discovered my love of reading much earlier - in 10th grade. That was when I started reading like crazy - I mean spending a good portion of my waking hours reading.
Anyway, I figured my notes would be crappy. After all, I was seventeen. I had no or little knowledge of the world. I was incredibly surprised to find 1) (here we go listing things again) my handwriting was crisp and nice, like it is now, when I want it to be (which is rare) and 2) the points I was making were not only good, but were as good or better than points I would make in the margins of my book today. Goddamit, I thought. I was smart.
Which made me sad. Because not only was I smart, then. I also clearly had a love, a desire to know. Something I've sort of lost. I can spend hours staring at crap on a computer screen (hello, woot.com) now, and I know that I wouldn't have been able to then. I would've prioritized better. I would have cared more. It takes effort for me to pick up a novel, now, because I know there is so much else I need to be doing. Then, I didn't give a damn about anything else.
Anyway, this is why I was sad yesterday.
Today, however, is a beautiful day (just look at the title of this blog post, for goodness sake). I am now in a bright, airy room, looking out onto beautiful Amsterdam Avenue, and thinking about how happy I am. The more things change, I guess.
The book also made me want to be a lawyer, and made me not want to be one, at the same time. It was still very good, the second time around.
The point is, I'm going to talk about a book that's tenuously related to my academic life right now. Which is why - and for no other reason - I am not going to mention the book's name, or its author, or what it's about. Maybe what it's about will come up, but I'll try not to let it.
Anyway, I was rereading a book yesterday for a pseudo-academic pursuit. I had read this book the first time in high school, and hadn't picked it up in as many years. It turns out I had written notes in it, when I was in twelfth grade, I think. This was in the highlight of my loving literature phase. I discovered books - really, for the first time, even though I had discovered my love of reading much earlier - in 10th grade. That was when I started reading like crazy - I mean spending a good portion of my waking hours reading.
Anyway, I figured my notes would be crappy. After all, I was seventeen. I had no or little knowledge of the world. I was incredibly surprised to find 1) (here we go listing things again) my handwriting was crisp and nice, like it is now, when I want it to be (which is rare) and 2) the points I was making were not only good, but were as good or better than points I would make in the margins of my book today. Goddamit, I thought. I was smart.
Which made me sad. Because not only was I smart, then. I also clearly had a love, a desire to know. Something I've sort of lost. I can spend hours staring at crap on a computer screen (hello, woot.com) now, and I know that I wouldn't have been able to then. I would've prioritized better. I would have cared more. It takes effort for me to pick up a novel, now, because I know there is so much else I need to be doing. Then, I didn't give a damn about anything else.
Anyway, this is why I was sad yesterday.
Today, however, is a beautiful day (just look at the title of this blog post, for goodness sake). I am now in a bright, airy room, looking out onto beautiful Amsterdam Avenue, and thinking about how happy I am. The more things change, I guess.
The book also made me want to be a lawyer, and made me not want to be one, at the same time. It was still very good, the second time around.
Saturday, October 28, 2006
The Idea of Blogging at Key West
Besides for being a basatardization of a great American poem (I'm tired of hyperbole - it's not the greatest, or even one of the greatest American poems - although there as a time when I'd have called it that), and a great idea (I really would love to be blogging in Key West right now, instead of in this frigid city), I thought it would be a nice idea to think about the idea of blogging.
I mostly started actually posting on this blog to give myself another chance to talk about myself. I mean, now, when the subject comes to the Internet, or when people talk about blogs, or when there's a lull in the conversation in general, I can say "oh I have a blog" "I talked about that on my blog" or "did you know I have a blog?" And then I can make a humorous comment about how even though the blog is called bezalela, it should be pronounced bezalel a, being my first name, bezalel, and my middle name, a, and I am not confused about my gender. Then we (meaning me and those I am talking to) lapse back into awkward silence.
But then I was thinking about it. I started writing on the blog because I thought it would make me write more in general. Besides for the year and a half burst when I was writing and revising my novel, and ocassional spurts of poetry, fiction, and criticism, I haven't been able to write consistently for very long about a single thing. I thought maybe if I forced myself to write a blog that would be half serious but mostly humorous, rhetorical, or pop-philosophical (how can something be half something but mostly something else? Figure that out...) then I would be able to sit down and write other things daily as well.
But, as I soon realized, writing the blog daily wasn't going to happen either. Writing the blog became similar to the way I write in general (except I don't edit the blog; I like the stream of consciousness effect of it, and I like laughing at the stupid spelling and gramatical mistakes I made when I read it over - which I do every couple of days). By that, I mean I write my blog sometimes once a week, sometimes more than once, sometimes less. There's no rhyme or reason to it. And while I like to think the writing I spend more time on (i.e. not this) is better than this, that might not be the case. I see me in both, which is weird. How can you see yourself in writing, anyway? It's just a bunch of letters. Script, that means nothing. Except you put it together, and it means something. It's a mystery, I guess.
This isn't, as I'm sure my 3 readers (who are astute and intelligent people, which is why they read this blog) have guessed, a goodbye to blogging. I'm not going to say, the experiment failed, so now I'll give it up. The experiment did fail, but I realized that I don't really care. While I like getting paid for my writing, and I like writing fiction and poetry that I hope one day I'll get paid for, I realized writing this blog that I also like spewing my thoughts, knowing (hoping, damnit, I'll be honest and say hoping) that anyone in the world can read them and then maybe they'll understand a little kernel of the world a little better, or at least think about something, or at least smile. It isn't fiction (well, most of it isn't), and I'm not getting paid for it. But it's still fun.
I mostly started actually posting on this blog to give myself another chance to talk about myself. I mean, now, when the subject comes to the Internet, or when people talk about blogs, or when there's a lull in the conversation in general, I can say "oh I have a blog" "I talked about that on my blog" or "did you know I have a blog?" And then I can make a humorous comment about how even though the blog is called bezalela, it should be pronounced bezalel a, being my first name, bezalel, and my middle name, a, and I am not confused about my gender. Then we (meaning me and those I am talking to) lapse back into awkward silence.
But then I was thinking about it. I started writing on the blog because I thought it would make me write more in general. Besides for the year and a half burst when I was writing and revising my novel, and ocassional spurts of poetry, fiction, and criticism, I haven't been able to write consistently for very long about a single thing. I thought maybe if I forced myself to write a blog that would be half serious but mostly humorous, rhetorical, or pop-philosophical (how can something be half something but mostly something else? Figure that out...) then I would be able to sit down and write other things daily as well.
But, as I soon realized, writing the blog daily wasn't going to happen either. Writing the blog became similar to the way I write in general (except I don't edit the blog; I like the stream of consciousness effect of it, and I like laughing at the stupid spelling and gramatical mistakes I made when I read it over - which I do every couple of days). By that, I mean I write my blog sometimes once a week, sometimes more than once, sometimes less. There's no rhyme or reason to it. And while I like to think the writing I spend more time on (i.e. not this) is better than this, that might not be the case. I see me in both, which is weird. How can you see yourself in writing, anyway? It's just a bunch of letters. Script, that means nothing. Except you put it together, and it means something. It's a mystery, I guess.
This isn't, as I'm sure my 3 readers (who are astute and intelligent people, which is why they read this blog) have guessed, a goodbye to blogging. I'm not going to say, the experiment failed, so now I'll give it up. The experiment did fail, but I realized that I don't really care. While I like getting paid for my writing, and I like writing fiction and poetry that I hope one day I'll get paid for, I realized writing this blog that I also like spewing my thoughts, knowing (hoping, damnit, I'll be honest and say hoping) that anyone in the world can read them and then maybe they'll understand a little kernel of the world a little better, or at least think about something, or at least smile. It isn't fiction (well, most of it isn't), and I'm not getting paid for it. But it's still fun.
Sunday, October 22, 2006
Street Fairs
I think a fun thing to blog about would be street fairs. In NY, in the fall, there is a street fair pretty much every weekend (Sat. and Sunday). These street fairs include about 5 of the same thing, about thirty times. They usually go on for about 15 blocks, closing traffic to all non-pedestrians (happy for me; sad for busses and cars), and you have to walk through the whole thing, to see if you're not missing anything.
You're not. This is what is at the NY street fair: Vegetarian Falafel Stand - this is always, for some reason, the first thing I see. There are 3 of these, always. Other things in the way of food are the disgusting mozarella type sandwich thing - there are 2 or 3 of those; The sad asian smoothy place that never seems to have any customers; The Thai food for $1 place; and the huge hunks of unidentifiable meat places.
Then you have the crappy jewelery places: these are about 75% of the street fair.
Then there's the weird random things. The huge paintings that are so hideous no one would buy them. The Victorian plush psychiatrists couch. The weird metallic statue that looks like it belongs in an Adams Family movie.
Then there's the star: the diamond in the rough. This is why you search. For the one thing - it's always one thing, and it isn't always even around. It's the good store. We found it (gf and I), today. Today it was a jewelery botique, but it wasn't crappy jewelery. It was jewelery made by an Eastern European (vaguely Russian?) (maybe Ukranian?) girl and her mother. The father was there too, but his position was unclear. The daughter seemed to be in charge. When I asked for a business card (their stuff was good enough to ask for a card), the father searched around among some random boxes for about 10 minutes, while I fidgeted uncomfortably, until he decided that he would make me my very own personal business card by tearing off a piece of paper, and writing his number on it - (or his wife's; or his daughter's; I wasn't really clear on this part). Then I scurried away, throwing the paper in the next trashcan I came to. Truth is, I had only asked for the business card in the first place to be nice.
You're not. This is what is at the NY street fair: Vegetarian Falafel Stand - this is always, for some reason, the first thing I see. There are 3 of these, always. Other things in the way of food are the disgusting mozarella type sandwich thing - there are 2 or 3 of those; The sad asian smoothy place that never seems to have any customers; The Thai food for $1 place; and the huge hunks of unidentifiable meat places.
Then you have the crappy jewelery places: these are about 75% of the street fair.
Then there's the weird random things. The huge paintings that are so hideous no one would buy them. The Victorian plush psychiatrists couch. The weird metallic statue that looks like it belongs in an Adams Family movie.
Then there's the star: the diamond in the rough. This is why you search. For the one thing - it's always one thing, and it isn't always even around. It's the good store. We found it (gf and I), today. Today it was a jewelery botique, but it wasn't crappy jewelery. It was jewelery made by an Eastern European (vaguely Russian?) (maybe Ukranian?) girl and her mother. The father was there too, but his position was unclear. The daughter seemed to be in charge. When I asked for a business card (their stuff was good enough to ask for a card), the father searched around among some random boxes for about 10 minutes, while I fidgeted uncomfortably, until he decided that he would make me my very own personal business card by tearing off a piece of paper, and writing his number on it - (or his wife's; or his daughter's; I wasn't really clear on this part). Then I scurried away, throwing the paper in the next trashcan I came to. Truth is, I had only asked for the business card in the first place to be nice.
Tuesday, October 17, 2006
Teeth Cleaning - Redux
I don't know about you, but I sure love not being able to feel the side of my face. As I write these words, I have absolutely no feeling in the left side of my face. I bite on my inner cheek (something the dentist told me not to do) and feel nothing. Nothing at all. It's pretty great.
Here is how this happened:
I went back across the street to the dentist in order to get a "cavity filled". (The dentist is across the street from my apartment. How convenient. And scary.) Now, I don't exactly now what getting a cavity filled means, but I do know that it involves, at first, injecting a lot of novacaine into the left side of my face.
Only problem is, the novacaine, or whatever it was, didn't really do anything. And so, when the dentist asked me if I could feel my tongue when I bit it, I said yes.
"Are you sure?" she said.
"Pretty sure," I said, feeling a searing pain flash through my mouth.
"Well," the dentist said, "I think I'm just going to go ahead with the procedure anyway"
So it was, that I got to have my cavity taken out, or put in, or whatever they do with cavities these days, without the benefits of novacaine. Needless to say, it wasn't the most pleasant experience.
On the plus side, the dentist who was doing the job was very sympathetic. "I'm really sorry," she kept saying, as I screamed through the sounds of the drilling of my enamel (or whatever it is they put on teeth these days).
Then, when the procedure was over, and my cavity was magically healed, I got up. Suddenly, I realized I couldn't feel the left side of my face.
"You might feel a little numb later", the dentist said.
"I'm way ahead of you," I replied.
And so, I, now, get to bite really hard down onto my tongue and not feel a thing. Is that blood, I wonder? Gotta run...
Here is how this happened:
I went back across the street to the dentist in order to get a "cavity filled". (The dentist is across the street from my apartment. How convenient. And scary.) Now, I don't exactly now what getting a cavity filled means, but I do know that it involves, at first, injecting a lot of novacaine into the left side of my face.
Only problem is, the novacaine, or whatever it was, didn't really do anything. And so, when the dentist asked me if I could feel my tongue when I bit it, I said yes.
"Are you sure?" she said.
"Pretty sure," I said, feeling a searing pain flash through my mouth.
"Well," the dentist said, "I think I'm just going to go ahead with the procedure anyway"
So it was, that I got to have my cavity taken out, or put in, or whatever they do with cavities these days, without the benefits of novacaine. Needless to say, it wasn't the most pleasant experience.
On the plus side, the dentist who was doing the job was very sympathetic. "I'm really sorry," she kept saying, as I screamed through the sounds of the drilling of my enamel (or whatever it is they put on teeth these days).
Then, when the procedure was over, and my cavity was magically healed, I got up. Suddenly, I realized I couldn't feel the left side of my face.
"You might feel a little numb later", the dentist said.
"I'm way ahead of you," I replied.
And so, I, now, get to bite really hard down onto my tongue and not feel a thing. Is that blood, I wonder? Gotta run...
Monday, October 16, 2006
Wednesday, October 11, 2006
Nicole Krauss
Maybe if I say Nicole Krauss a couple of times she will google herself and come to this site and I'll be able to talk to her in some sort of strange, post-modern, internety way. Nicole Krauss Nicole Krauss Nicole Krauss penis (that last one was to bring in all the people looking for gay porn sites).
Anyway, I'm going to assume I'm speaking to Nicole Krauss now, so I'll just address the rest of this post to you, Nicole.
I just recently finished your book "The History of Love". I know I'm a little late, and I'm sorry. But I really enjoyed it. Your writing, as I'm sure you've heard too many times, is wonderful. And while it can be a little cutsie at times (you know which chapters I'm thinking about), in general, it is incredibly moving.
But you know that. That's not why I'm writing to you. This is: You didn't let the book end. I hardly ever say this, ever, as I'm an impatient reader, generally, but your book was 100 pages too short. Why did it stop? I mean, I understood why it stopped, because it was cute and you had developed a neat idea and it would be hard to take it past the ending (a page for the kid, a page for the old man, these damn books don't have enough pages to add in a third character), but, come on, Nicole Krauss, you know as well as I do that you left us all hanging.
Now don't go saying that it's part of the "art". That it's the style of the book, that it's post-modern, that it's meant to leave an aura of wonder, as to what happens to, I don't know, all of the characters, after the final scene closes. You know, as well as I do, that that's a load of crap. You found a cutsie ending - an ending that worked (and the ending does work) - and you used it. Except by using it you more or less destroyed a novel that was bordering on perfection.
As someone who just recently (read: today) completed a book which also contains the word "History" in its title, I empathize with you. It took me approximately as long to write the last, thirty page chapter of my book as it took me to write the first two hundred and forty odd pages of it. Books are hard to end. Books are hard, even, to continue. God knows that I know that. But that doesn't mean we don't try. I read somewhere that you, Nicole Krauss, said that you stopped writing poetry because you were tired of trying to make the perfect poem, because, I think I'm quoting you sort of right (although I'm probably wrong), that perfection is unattainable. Well, Nicole Krauss, you had the perfect story there, almost. And then you let it hang. That was sad, for me.
In other news, if you'd like to read my book, leave me a post and I'll be happy to send it to you. Good talking to you, Nicole Krauss. I hope you are having a great night.
Anyway, I'm going to assume I'm speaking to Nicole Krauss now, so I'll just address the rest of this post to you, Nicole.
I just recently finished your book "The History of Love". I know I'm a little late, and I'm sorry. But I really enjoyed it. Your writing, as I'm sure you've heard too many times, is wonderful. And while it can be a little cutsie at times (you know which chapters I'm thinking about), in general, it is incredibly moving.
But you know that. That's not why I'm writing to you. This is: You didn't let the book end. I hardly ever say this, ever, as I'm an impatient reader, generally, but your book was 100 pages too short. Why did it stop? I mean, I understood why it stopped, because it was cute and you had developed a neat idea and it would be hard to take it past the ending (a page for the kid, a page for the old man, these damn books don't have enough pages to add in a third character), but, come on, Nicole Krauss, you know as well as I do that you left us all hanging.
Now don't go saying that it's part of the "art". That it's the style of the book, that it's post-modern, that it's meant to leave an aura of wonder, as to what happens to, I don't know, all of the characters, after the final scene closes. You know, as well as I do, that that's a load of crap. You found a cutsie ending - an ending that worked (and the ending does work) - and you used it. Except by using it you more or less destroyed a novel that was bordering on perfection.
As someone who just recently (read: today) completed a book which also contains the word "History" in its title, I empathize with you. It took me approximately as long to write the last, thirty page chapter of my book as it took me to write the first two hundred and forty odd pages of it. Books are hard to end. Books are hard, even, to continue. God knows that I know that. But that doesn't mean we don't try. I read somewhere that you, Nicole Krauss, said that you stopped writing poetry because you were tired of trying to make the perfect poem, because, I think I'm quoting you sort of right (although I'm probably wrong), that perfection is unattainable. Well, Nicole Krauss, you had the perfect story there, almost. And then you let it hang. That was sad, for me.
In other news, if you'd like to read my book, leave me a post and I'll be happy to send it to you. Good talking to you, Nicole Krauss. I hope you are having a great night.
Monday, October 09, 2006
Decisions
I like trains. Trains are fun. For some reason, I feel so free on a train - it's like the feeling I get when I'm on a highway, driving out, just starting. But when I'm driving, the feeling usually goes away after thirty minutes or so, because I have to pay attention to the driving.
Trains aren't like that. In a train, the newness and the excitement of newness never goes away. On the train last night, I was so happy. I'm so happy when I'm travelling. It's like endless possibilities, you can stop anywhere, you can go anywhere. And even though it's not true, and even though I know it's not true, and I know that I'm going to be in New York in an hour, and that, moreover, the track only goes in one direction: south, and the train only goes to one place: the city where I'll soon be, but it doesn't matter. It's the feeling that matters.
Trains aren't like that. In a train, the newness and the excitement of newness never goes away. On the train last night, I was so happy. I'm so happy when I'm travelling. It's like endless possibilities, you can stop anywhere, you can go anywhere. And even though it's not true, and even though I know it's not true, and I know that I'm going to be in New York in an hour, and that, moreover, the track only goes in one direction: south, and the train only goes to one place: the city where I'll soon be, but it doesn't matter. It's the feeling that matters.
Thursday, October 05, 2006
Good Magazine - Part Two (The Upstairs)
Just when you all had given up hope of ever reading about me and RPP's further adventures at the good magazine party, I come and satisfy your thirst for all the lurid details. See, that's my style. I get you excited about something. And then I withhold. And withhold. And then you forget about it. And then I bring it up again. It's called good writing.
So, when we last left our heroes, the seductively intrepid RPP and the casually handsome BAS, we had finally crossed the barrier between good and awesome, represented in this case by the steps from the second to the third floors of the party.
The third floor was like something out of Charlie and the Chocolate Factory - and by that I mean the good Charlie and the Chocolate Factory, you know, the one we grew up with, not the crappy Johnny Depp one, where he overacts to compensate for the fact that he has no idea how to act, and where it's just spooky and weird, as opposed to the first one, where it's only slightly spooky, and highly weird, and all around great. Man, those little people (munchkins? doodads? what're they called) from the first one totally kick the butt's of the one little guy in the remake. But, I digress.
The third floor was a wonderland. Their were all these really cool looking people. BTW - RPP pointed this out to me afterwards - everyone there was hot. I mean really, really hot. RPP and I were by far the shortest people there - and I am pretty average, height-wise - 5'9" (which is actually exactly average). Everyone was really thin, also (RPP is good at that part). And also really attractive. I cannot emphasize this enough.
Ok, maybe I can.
Anyway, there was this really cool "piece of art" that took up a good chunk of the first corridor we went up to (which was a really wide hall, which led of to a number of side rooms). This is the one cool piece of art I mentioned in Good Magazine - the prequel. It looked like this: Have you ever been to Disneyworld? If I say this, would you know what I'm talking about? "It's the wildest ride in the wilderness!"
Know what I'm talking about?
Know what I'm referring to?
Hmm? Hmm?
Ok, this is it. It was Thunder Mountain Railroad. It was so cool. It was this huge, over-life sized diarama of a mining western canyon, with real tunnels and train tracks and everything. Except smaller. The whole mountain was maybe 12 feet high and probably 12 feet wide. It was so awesome. It was the one good piece of art in all of the building.
Oh wait, there was something else, in the next room, that was pretty awesome too. Ok, there's this photographer, that's trying to take pictures of children in New York. But wait, it's not what you're thinking (at least not what I hope you're not thinking). Here's the cutsie, non-ironic part: She's trying to take pictures of children in New York from every country on earth. Isn't that genius? Isn't that non-ironic fun? I love it. So far she's got over a hundred countries - there are only about forty or fifty, I think, left. And I'm sure they're around. One of them is Seychelles. Where I really want to go, someday.
Ok, the next room was about water. It was lame.
The next room was the "cool room". This is how I found out it was the cool room. Everyone in that room was super hot, and there was a bouncer at the door. This is another way I found out it was the cool room. The bouncer didn't let us in.
That was sad.
Then we went to the water room, so we could peek into the cool room (there was a window between the two), and pretend we didn't care that the bouncer didn't let us in.
Then we went to the party room. The party room was insane. Suddenly there were approximately a million people and crazy music. It was awesome. We left 10 minutes later.
In short, we met some good people, had some good times, and took a picture to be published at goodmagazine.com of me and RPP holding a sign that says: "Daven, like you give a damn"
Also, we got 4 packs of gum. It was a good night.
So, when we last left our heroes, the seductively intrepid RPP and the casually handsome BAS, we had finally crossed the barrier between good and awesome, represented in this case by the steps from the second to the third floors of the party.
The third floor was like something out of Charlie and the Chocolate Factory - and by that I mean the good Charlie and the Chocolate Factory, you know, the one we grew up with, not the crappy Johnny Depp one, where he overacts to compensate for the fact that he has no idea how to act, and where it's just spooky and weird, as opposed to the first one, where it's only slightly spooky, and highly weird, and all around great. Man, those little people (munchkins? doodads? what're they called) from the first one totally kick the butt's of the one little guy in the remake. But, I digress.
The third floor was a wonderland. Their were all these really cool looking people. BTW - RPP pointed this out to me afterwards - everyone there was hot. I mean really, really hot. RPP and I were by far the shortest people there - and I am pretty average, height-wise - 5'9" (which is actually exactly average). Everyone was really thin, also (RPP is good at that part). And also really attractive. I cannot emphasize this enough.
Ok, maybe I can.
Anyway, there was this really cool "piece of art" that took up a good chunk of the first corridor we went up to (which was a really wide hall, which led of to a number of side rooms). This is the one cool piece of art I mentioned in Good Magazine - the prequel. It looked like this: Have you ever been to Disneyworld? If I say this, would you know what I'm talking about? "It's the wildest ride in the wilderness!"
Know what I'm talking about?
Know what I'm referring to?
Hmm? Hmm?
Ok, this is it. It was Thunder Mountain Railroad. It was so cool. It was this huge, over-life sized diarama of a mining western canyon, with real tunnels and train tracks and everything. Except smaller. The whole mountain was maybe 12 feet high and probably 12 feet wide. It was so awesome. It was the one good piece of art in all of the building.
Oh wait, there was something else, in the next room, that was pretty awesome too. Ok, there's this photographer, that's trying to take pictures of children in New York. But wait, it's not what you're thinking (at least not what I hope you're not thinking). Here's the cutsie, non-ironic part: She's trying to take pictures of children in New York from every country on earth. Isn't that genius? Isn't that non-ironic fun? I love it. So far she's got over a hundred countries - there are only about forty or fifty, I think, left. And I'm sure they're around. One of them is Seychelles. Where I really want to go, someday.
Ok, the next room was about water. It was lame.
The next room was the "cool room". This is how I found out it was the cool room. Everyone in that room was super hot, and there was a bouncer at the door. This is another way I found out it was the cool room. The bouncer didn't let us in.
That was sad.
Then we went to the water room, so we could peek into the cool room (there was a window between the two), and pretend we didn't care that the bouncer didn't let us in.
Then we went to the party room. The party room was insane. Suddenly there were approximately a million people and crazy music. It was awesome. We left 10 minutes later.
In short, we met some good people, had some good times, and took a picture to be published at goodmagazine.com of me and RPP holding a sign that says: "Daven, like you give a damn"
Also, we got 4 packs of gum. It was a good night.
Busy...
And I promise that this won't just become a link site. But this guy is funny - I went to Brandeis with him, and he also wrote for the Justice...
Tuesday, October 03, 2006
Sunday, October 01, 2006
So close...
I want to take this opportunity to ask forgiveness of the three people who read this blog for anything I might have done against them, during this past year, or ever. I am really, truly sorry.
Thursday, September 28, 2006
What does the Times have against Lamont?
Interesting that, now that Lieberman is destroying Lamont in the polls with a 10 point lead, the New York Times no longer sees fit to report extensively on the race. Come on, NYT. You're not doing your job! I want to be told again how great Lamont is, and on how evil Lieberman is.
Go Joe!
Go Joe!
Wednesday, September 27, 2006
Regina Spektor
Riding back from Maryland with an old friend on Sunday night I got the chance to listen to a lot of music that I wouldn't normally enjoy. Most of it was good. Regina Spektor was great. I have found a new love. The song Fidelity - the one I heard in the car on Sunday night - is beautiful and moving. I don't know if people who are into music more than me know about her, but you all should. Here's a link to her website. Click on music, and then enjoy. It seems like all her albums are online for free. You won't be disappointed.
Now that you've listened, I can talk about it. She reminds me of a cross between Dido and Alanis Morissette. Her voice is simply beautiful. She goes so high, but she has the effect of whispering that Dido does so well. And the words are great. "The history books forgot about us / and the Bible didn't mention us / the Bible didn't mention us / not even once." That's from Samson.
I want to hear this woman live.
For those of you wondering where Part 2 of Good Magazine is, it'll come
Now that you've listened, I can talk about it. She reminds me of a cross between Dido and Alanis Morissette. Her voice is simply beautiful. She goes so high, but she has the effect of whispering that Dido does so well. And the words are great. "The history books forgot about us / and the Bible didn't mention us / the Bible didn't mention us / not even once." That's from Samson.
I want to hear this woman live.
For those of you wondering where Part 2 of Good Magazine is, it'll come
Tuesday, September 26, 2006
Good (Great?) (Mediocore?) Magazine
So me and a friend (to preserve her anonymity, I will simply call her RPP) went to this party last week for Good Magazine. Good Magazine is a new, twenty-something-ish-type magazine which, miracle of miracles - unlike every other lame hip trendy twenty-something magazine, web-zine, tv show, rant, and blog - does not try to be ironic. God, we are so sick of irony. I am sick of you Heeb Magazine. I am sick of you, McSweeneys. I am so so so so sick of you, Dave Eggers. Go off into a cave and write another Heartbreaking Work of Staggering Genius, because everything since then has pretty much been just Staggering.
Good Magazine is not about irony. It is about really interesting and informative, and, most importantly, non-ironic, issues. It is about being good (tm) (patent pending). It is, in a word, awesome. At least the first issue is. Really. I don't know why I am plugging them so much. They should pay me. But they don't. I'll move on.
Anywho, subscribers (as I and my loyal friend RPP are) were invited to a kick-off party in Chelsea at some super hip, trendy, and (unfortunately) incredibly ironic gallery. I thought it would be sort of casual, twenty-somethingy, so I wore jeans (gap $50) and a button down shirt (gap $50). Everything I own comes from gap and costs $50. I am non-ironic.
RPP was looking hot. But then again, RPP always looks hot.
Anyway, everyone was super over-dressed, and I felt like such an idiot, but then I didn't feel like an idiot, I felt like a guy who was waiting in line for 40 minutes to get into a party. When we finally got in, we got to see some neat weird, incredibly ironic art on the first floor of this coolish loft art gallery space. Most of the art, sucked. To be honest. There was one piece on the third floor that was really cool, though. But I'm not at the 3rd floor yet. We'll get there, in a paragraph or two.
There were a bunch of little galleries on the second floor. In one, which was really weird - one art piece was an open book - I accidentally ran into the artist, a very small probably forty-something Asian woman. After apologizing (she was only slightly bruised) we had an awkward conversation that went something like this:
Me: So, you made this stuff?
Artist: Yes.
Me: Which one's your favorite?
Artist (clearly taken aback): Um, I like that one (pointing to the far side of the room)
Me: How come?
Artist: Because it has a double meaning.
Me: You rock.
Ahh, it has a double meaning. Now I understand. I am one with the world.
Anyway, after waiting on line for about another thirty minutes to go up to the third (read: cool) floor, we finally didn't make it upstairs, because it was at capacity. Instead we found a bar downstairs and drank our sorrows away (non-alcoholically, of course).
Then, when we went back to get up to the third floor, we found it was magically free of people waiting to get up to it. We went up and had great adventures.
What were they, you ask? Well, I will tell you. But not today. At least not now. Our adventures will continue, in Episode 2, which I have cleverly titled (in advance): "Good Magazine: Part 2"
Good Magazine is not about irony. It is about really interesting and informative, and, most importantly, non-ironic, issues. It is about being good (tm) (patent pending). It is, in a word, awesome. At least the first issue is. Really. I don't know why I am plugging them so much. They should pay me. But they don't. I'll move on.
Anywho, subscribers (as I and my loyal friend RPP are) were invited to a kick-off party in Chelsea at some super hip, trendy, and (unfortunately) incredibly ironic gallery. I thought it would be sort of casual, twenty-somethingy, so I wore jeans (gap $50) and a button down shirt (gap $50). Everything I own comes from gap and costs $50. I am non-ironic.
RPP was looking hot. But then again, RPP always looks hot.
Anyway, everyone was super over-dressed, and I felt like such an idiot, but then I didn't feel like an idiot, I felt like a guy who was waiting in line for 40 minutes to get into a party. When we finally got in, we got to see some neat weird, incredibly ironic art on the first floor of this coolish loft art gallery space. Most of the art, sucked. To be honest. There was one piece on the third floor that was really cool, though. But I'm not at the 3rd floor yet. We'll get there, in a paragraph or two.
There were a bunch of little galleries on the second floor. In one, which was really weird - one art piece was an open book - I accidentally ran into the artist, a very small probably forty-something Asian woman. After apologizing (she was only slightly bruised) we had an awkward conversation that went something like this:
Me: So, you made this stuff?
Artist: Yes.
Me: Which one's your favorite?
Artist (clearly taken aback): Um, I like that one (pointing to the far side of the room)
Me: How come?
Artist: Because it has a double meaning.
Me: You rock.
Ahh, it has a double meaning. Now I understand. I am one with the world.
Anyway, after waiting on line for about another thirty minutes to go up to the third (read: cool) floor, we finally didn't make it upstairs, because it was at capacity. Instead we found a bar downstairs and drank our sorrows away (non-alcoholically, of course).
Then, when we went back to get up to the third floor, we found it was magically free of people waiting to get up to it. We went up and had great adventures.
What were they, you ask? Well, I will tell you. But not today. At least not now. Our adventures will continue, in Episode 2, which I have cleverly titled (in advance): "Good Magazine: Part 2"
Wednesday, September 20, 2006
Teeth Cleaning
Has anybody else ever felt that they were drowning while having a routine dental cleaning?
I almost died today. I am sure of it. In the dentists chair. The dentist was incredibly nice. She was friendly, and although her English wasn't great I think I knew what she was trying to tell me. But then she stuck this thing in my mouth that shoots water in there. I know of this thing. I have seen it before. I have also feared it. But never before as a mortal enemy. Usually, in the past, I have been instructed, every once in a while, to rinse out the large amounts of water that this thing injects into my throat - keep in mind, I am lying back in the reclining dentist's chair, in a perfectly chokeable position - so, while the water shooting thingy (which, for no other reason than because I feel like it right now, I've decided to call a spigot), so, while the spigot has been a scary thing to my past, it has never been nefarious. But today, oh today was...different. I was never told to rinse. I was never told to spit out. Instead, I just lay there, helpless in the dentist's chair, as the water spigot filled my mouth with more and more water, which mingled with the blood from my teeth and whatever gross stuff was in there and threatened to kill me.
I ended up almost choking on my own blood and the water from the evil water spigot. Instead, I swallowed, closing my mouth as I did so. "What are you doing?" The dentist said, or I think she said. I couldn't really tell, through the choking and all. And then, "are you ok?" Either she said that or she was talking about something else, but I'm pretty sure she asked me if I was ok. "Fine," I said, causing myself to gag on what water remained in my mouth.
Which brings me to my next point: Why would anyone ever want to be a dentist? Anyone, I mean, of course, except for crazy sadistic masochistic freaks. Which my dentist, of course, was not. Especially if she's reading this. If she's reading this, I loved her very much, and look forward to being strangled - er, treated - again.
And I will be. I'm going back in a couple of weeks because, due to no fault of my own (I blame the water spigot) I have somehow developed two small cavities. And so, while my "oral hygeine is good", I "clearly never floss", (those both the words of my beloved dentist)...
Which brings me back to my original - er, second - point. Or maybe third. Why would anyone ever want to be a dentist? It's bad enough to have things stuck inside my mouth. But to have to stick things into other peoples mouths? To have to look at the insides of someone's mouth all day and to play around with metal implements in there and to tolerate onion and garlic breath and to be nice about it? I don't think so.
I almost died today. I am sure of it. In the dentists chair. The dentist was incredibly nice. She was friendly, and although her English wasn't great I think I knew what she was trying to tell me. But then she stuck this thing in my mouth that shoots water in there. I know of this thing. I have seen it before. I have also feared it. But never before as a mortal enemy. Usually, in the past, I have been instructed, every once in a while, to rinse out the large amounts of water that this thing injects into my throat - keep in mind, I am lying back in the reclining dentist's chair, in a perfectly chokeable position - so, while the water shooting thingy (which, for no other reason than because I feel like it right now, I've decided to call a spigot), so, while the spigot has been a scary thing to my past, it has never been nefarious. But today, oh today was...different. I was never told to rinse. I was never told to spit out. Instead, I just lay there, helpless in the dentist's chair, as the water spigot filled my mouth with more and more water, which mingled with the blood from my teeth and whatever gross stuff was in there and threatened to kill me.
I ended up almost choking on my own blood and the water from the evil water spigot. Instead, I swallowed, closing my mouth as I did so. "What are you doing?" The dentist said, or I think she said. I couldn't really tell, through the choking and all. And then, "are you ok?" Either she said that or she was talking about something else, but I'm pretty sure she asked me if I was ok. "Fine," I said, causing myself to gag on what water remained in my mouth.
Which brings me to my next point: Why would anyone ever want to be a dentist? Anyone, I mean, of course, except for crazy sadistic masochistic freaks. Which my dentist, of course, was not. Especially if she's reading this. If she's reading this, I loved her very much, and look forward to being strangled - er, treated - again.
And I will be. I'm going back in a couple of weeks because, due to no fault of my own (I blame the water spigot) I have somehow developed two small cavities. And so, while my "oral hygeine is good", I "clearly never floss", (those both the words of my beloved dentist)...
Which brings me back to my original - er, second - point. Or maybe third. Why would anyone ever want to be a dentist? It's bad enough to have things stuck inside my mouth. But to have to stick things into other peoples mouths? To have to look at the insides of someone's mouth all day and to play around with metal implements in there and to tolerate onion and garlic breath and to be nice about it? I don't think so.
Tuesday, September 19, 2006
Bagels, Cream Cheese, Tuna Fish
You may think that two of the above three things are great together - there are some tuna on bagel people, and some cream cheese on bagel people, but there are very very (all too) few of you that would think that the three substances - all tasty delicious alone - would be tasty delicious together.
The vast majority of you, however, would be in the wrong. I have found that - for some reason, especially when I'm incredibly hungry - I desire nothing as much as a nice poppy bagel, topped with cream cheese, and bottomed with tuna (with a little lettuce and tomato to give it some extra oomph). Now, when I order the above delicacy at a bagel place, I am usually given an awkward stare by at least two people (the cashier and the guy waiting to order behind me) and sometimes by more (everyone else in the store, once). But the mix is amazing, I tell you. It is like manna from heaven. Everyone should try it, at least once.
That is all.
The vast majority of you, however, would be in the wrong. I have found that - for some reason, especially when I'm incredibly hungry - I desire nothing as much as a nice poppy bagel, topped with cream cheese, and bottomed with tuna (with a little lettuce and tomato to give it some extra oomph). Now, when I order the above delicacy at a bagel place, I am usually given an awkward stare by at least two people (the cashier and the guy waiting to order behind me) and sometimes by more (everyone else in the store, once). But the mix is amazing, I tell you. It is like manna from heaven. Everyone should try it, at least once.
That is all.
Sunday, September 17, 2006
David Broza
I went to Jewzapallooza today in Riverside Park for the David Broza concert. I love his music - it's so chill, it makes me feel calm and alive when I hear him. This is the second time I've heard him in concert - he didn't play for so long this time, maybe 45 minutes, but I was right up front, and he sounded awesome. Looked a lot older than last time I saw him, 3 or 4 years ago, but I guess a lot has happened since then.
I didn't know about half of the songs he played, but they were all great. Mitachat La'Shamayim (under the heavens) is probably the most beautiful love song I know, in any language. I remember, every time I hear it, the one play I was in in college, when we played it during a scene where the entire cast was dancing in slow motion. It was Romeo and Juliet, and this was the scene where Romeo and Juliet first meet. We're all dancing, slowly, perfectly, and suddenly, Romeo and Juliet spot each other, from across the room (or in this case, because the play was staged outside, across the field), and move towards each other. We're all dancing, and the music is playing so softly, so slowly, and Romeo and Juliet are moving towards each other, and then they touch, just their hands, like touching a mirror.
I wasn't Romeo (or Juliet) in the play, by the way. I was the Prince. A perfect role for me.
The Broza concert, though, is what I was writing about. That song was great. And then he closed with his most famous song, Yiheyeh Tov (it will be good), which is also beautiful, but overplayed, and has become something of a modern classic Israeli peace song. I always think the narrator of the song - who keeps repeating, loosely translated, in the chorus, "It will be good, it will be good, yes, it will be good of this I swear" - is a lot like the narrator of Keats's Ode to a Grecian Urn, who constently repeats the phrase "oh happy...oh happy, happy". Indicating, of course, that things are not happy. I love that idea, that too much of something means its opposite. It's often true. With the Broza song, as well. Maybe. And I think he understands that. Maybe.
I didn't know about half of the songs he played, but they were all great. Mitachat La'Shamayim (under the heavens) is probably the most beautiful love song I know, in any language. I remember, every time I hear it, the one play I was in in college, when we played it during a scene where the entire cast was dancing in slow motion. It was Romeo and Juliet, and this was the scene where Romeo and Juliet first meet. We're all dancing, slowly, perfectly, and suddenly, Romeo and Juliet spot each other, from across the room (or in this case, because the play was staged outside, across the field), and move towards each other. We're all dancing, and the music is playing so softly, so slowly, and Romeo and Juliet are moving towards each other, and then they touch, just their hands, like touching a mirror.
I wasn't Romeo (or Juliet) in the play, by the way. I was the Prince. A perfect role for me.
The Broza concert, though, is what I was writing about. That song was great. And then he closed with his most famous song, Yiheyeh Tov (it will be good), which is also beautiful, but overplayed, and has become something of a modern classic Israeli peace song. I always think the narrator of the song - who keeps repeating, loosely translated, in the chorus, "It will be good, it will be good, yes, it will be good of this I swear" - is a lot like the narrator of Keats's Ode to a Grecian Urn, who constently repeats the phrase "oh happy...oh happy, happy". Indicating, of course, that things are not happy. I love that idea, that too much of something means its opposite. It's often true. With the Broza song, as well. Maybe. And I think he understands that. Maybe.
Saturday, September 16, 2006
Wallace Stevens
Quick question: Does anybody know of a good biography of Wallace Stevens? I was thinking about Stevens a lot today: about his tormented poetry, about the fact that he was a lawyer and his "real" life was probably so different from the excitement and newness of his poems, and I was wondering, then, how and what his life was like.
Actually, to get into it more, I was sitting in Riverside Park with the gf looking out at the Hudson River, and it was a beautiful day, it was Shabbos (the holy Sabbath), and I looked out and up and through the trees, and suddenly was pierced by the final and beginning images of my favorite (or one of my favorite) Stevens poem - Sunday Morning, about how it's all here and now, the beauty, and we should just appreciate it. I want to quote it. Maybe I will. It's basically about forgetting about the heavenly God or gods and focusing on the here and the beauty of the earth. And I got that picture, and then, almost coterminably, into my mind came the image of a sad, lonely, lawyer Stevens, sitting at his bland, melancholy desk and staring at a brown, unadorned wall. Who knows - maybe it's true or not. I wish I knew. Thus, the Stevens biography. I wish I knew the man. He was probably very crotchety. I love his poems.
Here is the last stanza of Sunday Morning:
She hears, upon that water without sound,
A voice that cries, "The tomb in Palestine
Is not the porch of spirits lingering.
It is the grave of Jesus, where he lay."
We live in an old chaos of the sun,
Or old dependency of day and night,
Or island solitude, unsponsored, free,
Of that wide water, inescapable.
Deer walk upon our mountains, and the quail
Whistle about us their spontaneous cries;
Sweet berries ripen in the wilderness;
And, in the isolation of the sky,
At evening, casual flocks of pigeons make
Ambiguous undulations as they sink,
Downward to darkness, on extended wings.
Actually, to get into it more, I was sitting in Riverside Park with the gf looking out at the Hudson River, and it was a beautiful day, it was Shabbos (the holy Sabbath), and I looked out and up and through the trees, and suddenly was pierced by the final and beginning images of my favorite (or one of my favorite) Stevens poem - Sunday Morning, about how it's all here and now, the beauty, and we should just appreciate it. I want to quote it. Maybe I will. It's basically about forgetting about the heavenly God or gods and focusing on the here and the beauty of the earth. And I got that picture, and then, almost coterminably, into my mind came the image of a sad, lonely, lawyer Stevens, sitting at his bland, melancholy desk and staring at a brown, unadorned wall. Who knows - maybe it's true or not. I wish I knew. Thus, the Stevens biography. I wish I knew the man. He was probably very crotchety. I love his poems.
Here is the last stanza of Sunday Morning:
She hears, upon that water without sound,
A voice that cries, "The tomb in Palestine
Is not the porch of spirits lingering.
It is the grave of Jesus, where he lay."
We live in an old chaos of the sun,
Or old dependency of day and night,
Or island solitude, unsponsored, free,
Of that wide water, inescapable.
Deer walk upon our mountains, and the quail
Whistle about us their spontaneous cries;
Sweet berries ripen in the wilderness;
And, in the isolation of the sky,
At evening, casual flocks of pigeons make
Ambiguous undulations as they sink,
Downward to darkness, on extended wings.
Friday, September 15, 2006
Reckless Rites
This is a book review published today in the Jerusalem Post. With a picture of the book cover here.
That said, I'm going to try to start making this blog more about posting actual messages and words and less about putting up some of the random things that I publish. No, no I won't. I'm not really sure what I'll do.
I saw Studio Sixty on the Sunset Strip's premier last night - it was pretty good. I don't think it's going to succeed - which is sad - it's sort of ridiculous that I'm getting sad that something won't succeed when it hasn't even failed yet - in fact, I don't think it's even premeired yet.
But I digress. For some reason (strangely, I think that the gods of NBC believe that you watch the premier for free, without ads, on tvguide.com, you'll watch it again, with ads, on Monday night at 10), as you can probably figure out by that aside, nbc put up the entire pilot on tvguide.com. You should check it out. Bradley Whitford (sp?) and Matthew Perry are great together - I think Sorkin realized this from the couple of episodes he had Perry do on the West Wing - which weren't great, but where the interaction between Whitford and Perry's characters was pretty strong. And having Danny Cancanan back (who the hell cares what his none West Wing name is - for me he'll always be Danny) - and playing a very Dany Cancanan like character (I'll let you see it for yourself) is always a pleasure.
I also love the self-referentiality of it all. The writer and director (both Sorkin, clearly) who both have bad drug habits they can't kick but are clearly the best in the business. Clearly. I use that word too much. The evil studio who needs Sorkin - oh, I'm sorry, who needs the main characters - but hates them just as much. It was genius, also, that Sorkin got in a huge and intense rant about the awfulness of television and could just blame it on a departing character. The show is great. I give it five episodes.
It was also great that while this was clearly meant to be NBC (Studio Sixty = SNL) someone up there who thinks all Americans are as idiotic as him or herself made sure to have a reference to another station named NBC - which the new President of this station - NBS (no similarities there) - was poached from. Wow, now I realize that this can't be NBC! What kind of idiots do they think we are?
And the greatest thing about it is, Sorkin - who probably wrote those lines, with NBC's approval in mind, knows we're not idiots. (And by we I mean the American public). He knows we're going to get it. But he also knows the higher ups at NBC won't think we will. I've missed you, Aaron.
That said, I'm going to try to start making this blog more about posting actual messages and words and less about putting up some of the random things that I publish. No, no I won't. I'm not really sure what I'll do.
I saw Studio Sixty on the Sunset Strip's premier last night - it was pretty good. I don't think it's going to succeed - which is sad - it's sort of ridiculous that I'm getting sad that something won't succeed when it hasn't even failed yet - in fact, I don't think it's even premeired yet.
But I digress. For some reason (strangely, I think that the gods of NBC believe that you watch the premier for free, without ads, on tvguide.com, you'll watch it again, with ads, on Monday night at 10), as you can probably figure out by that aside, nbc put up the entire pilot on tvguide.com. You should check it out. Bradley Whitford (sp?) and Matthew Perry are great together - I think Sorkin realized this from the couple of episodes he had Perry do on the West Wing - which weren't great, but where the interaction between Whitford and Perry's characters was pretty strong. And having Danny Cancanan back (who the hell cares what his none West Wing name is - for me he'll always be Danny) - and playing a very Dany Cancanan like character (I'll let you see it for yourself) is always a pleasure.
I also love the self-referentiality of it all. The writer and director (both Sorkin, clearly) who both have bad drug habits they can't kick but are clearly the best in the business. Clearly. I use that word too much. The evil studio who needs Sorkin - oh, I'm sorry, who needs the main characters - but hates them just as much. It was genius, also, that Sorkin got in a huge and intense rant about the awfulness of television and could just blame it on a departing character. The show is great. I give it five episodes.
It was also great that while this was clearly meant to be NBC (Studio Sixty = SNL) someone up there who thinks all Americans are as idiotic as him or herself made sure to have a reference to another station named NBC - which the new President of this station - NBS (no similarities there) - was poached from. Wow, now I realize that this can't be NBC! What kind of idiots do they think we are?
And the greatest thing about it is, Sorkin - who probably wrote those lines, with NBC's approval in mind, knows we're not idiots. (And by we I mean the American public). He knows we're going to get it. But he also knows the higher ups at NBC won't think we will. I've missed you, Aaron.
Saturday, August 12, 2006
I really like this story
well, it's not a story really. It's an appreciation of one of my favorite (but not my favorite) Agnon Novel, "A Simple Story". I wrote a story with the title a Simple Story a couple of years ago. It was published somewhere. Maybe I'll post it sometime.
The Agnon piece is here.
The Agnon piece is here.
Monday, May 15, 2006
Sunday, April 16, 2006
Graphic Novel Review
On jbooks - oh and about the old articles, I decided not to do that for now. If I get the inkling in the future, I'll post some of them. I really like this review. It's more of a personal essay, which I don't do that often, so it was fun.
Friday, January 20, 2006
Fleischer Memoir
The Jerusalem Post has just published a review of mine on Ari Fleischer's tell all account of his years as press secretary for President Bush. Read it here.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)